Richard Rende

3.9k citations
62 papers · 2.9k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Rende

59 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Richard Rende
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 702
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 308
  • Applied Psychology 96
  • Physiology 489
Replace Julie Boergers with:
Julie Boergers United States
David J. DeWit Canada
Theodore Jacob United States
Meyer D. Glantz United States
Maria M. Wong United States
David S. Bennett United States
Shang-Min Liu United States
Shannon E. Daley United States
Rina D. Eiden United States
Kristine Marceau United States
Richard Rende relative to Julie Boergers United States Julie Boergers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Julie Boergers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Rende

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Rende's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Rende with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Rende more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Rende

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Rende. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Rende. The network helps show where Richard Rende may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Rende, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Rende Line = papers co-authored together Richard Rende links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009298
2 1995248
3 2001215
4 2008202
5 2014122
6 1994119
7 2005110
8 200798
9 199398
10 199795
11
Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology (Vol.2): Internalizing and externalizing expressions of dysfunction
199188
12 200583
13 200875
14 199373
15 198870
16 199268
17 199263
18 200858
19 198955
20 200750

About Richard Rende

Richard Rende is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Physiology and Social Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (26 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (17 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (9 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (7 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (702 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (308 citations), Applied Psychology (96 citations) and Physiology (489 citations). Richard Rende has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert Plomin, Cheryl Slomkowski, Raymond Niaura, Elizabeth E. Lloyd‐Richardson, Stephen E. Gilman, Lee Anne Thompson, Craig Edelbrock, Brian Hitsman, Katherine J. Conger and Rand D. Conger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Addiction, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Affective Disorders and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact