Richard Rees

490 citations
19 papers · 261 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Rees

17 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Richard Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 105
  • Neurology 63
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 47
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 43
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 3
Replace V. Wong with:
V. Wong Hong Kong
Colin Kazina Canada
E. E. Patterson United States
Daniela Audenino Italy
Charles Deacon Canada
Paul Timmings New Zealand
Elaine Hicks United Kingdom
Roberta Di Giacomo Italy
Prashant Jauhari India
Ricky W. Lee United States
Richard Rees relative to V. Wong Hong Kong V. Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
V. Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Rees. The network helps show where Richard Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Rees Line = papers co-authored together Richard Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2012108
2 201830
3 202117
4 201816
5 202113
6 200713
7 197813
8 201610
9 20219
10
Complementary medicine in the United Kingdom.
19978
11 20247
12 19866
13
The Tokelau Islands children's study: atoll and New Zealand comparisons: physical growth.
19794
14 20123
15 20202
16 19771
17 20091
18 20230
19 20210

About Richard Rees

Richard Rees is a scholar working on Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations), Neurology (63 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (47 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (43 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (3 citations). Richard Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alastair J. Noyce, Anette Schrag, Robert G. Kowalski, Romergryko G. Geocadin, J. Kent Werner, Haley Goodwin, Grace Kim, Wendy Ziai, Jonathan P. Bestwick and Andrew J. Lees. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Research, Neurology, Movement Disorders, Journal of Parkinson s Disease and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact