Richard E. Shute

463 citations
21 papers · 330 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Richard E. Shute

20 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Richard E. Shute
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 27
  • Organic Chemistry 189
  • Biotechnology 28
  • Molecular Biology 192
  • Microbiology 14
Replace Andreas Schumacher with:
Andreas Schumacher Switzerland
Stephen D. Géro France
Emma M. Dangerfield New Zealand
Israil Pendrak United States
Michail Tsakos Greece
Mohammed Ahmar France
Sheryl D. Debenham United States
Han‐Young Kang South Korea
Matthias Riedrich Germany
G. Chandrashekar India
Richard E. Shute relative to Andreas Schumacher Switzerland Andreas Schumacher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andreas Schumacher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Shute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Shute's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Shute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Shute more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Shute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Shute. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Shute. The network helps show where Richard E. Shute may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Shute, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Shute Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Shute links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198953
2 198751
3 198740
4 198836
5 200130
6 200428
7 198515
8 198712
9 198811
10 19879
11 19948
12 19987
13 19737
14 19935
15 19975
16 19834
17 19883
18 20252
19 19892
20 19882

About Richard E. Shute

Richard E. Shute is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Molecular Medicine and Information Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (8 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (5 papers), Synthesis of β-Lactam Compounds (5 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (2 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (2 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (27 citations), Organic Chemistry (189 citations), Biotechnology (28 citations), Molecular Biology (192 citations) and Microbiology (14 citations). Richard E. Shute has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel H. Rich, Brian Dunlap, Barrie W. Bycroft, Megumi Kawai, David J. Buttle, D. H. RICH, A. John Barrett, A A Kembhavi, Andrew B. Holmes and Catherine J. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Chemical Communications, Synthesis, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Tetrahedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact