Richard Appiah

23 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Richard Appiah
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Social Psychology 78
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 64
  • Health 26
  • Applied Psychology 16
  • General Health Professions 69
Replace Sara Wigderson with:
Sara Wigderson United States
Nutifafa Eugene Yaw Dey Ghana
Ali Giusto United States
Isaiah Gitonga Kenya
Tanya J. Quille United States
Melissa J. Grey United States
Anshu Mohan United States
Donald R. Gerke United States
Dario Longhi United States
Nam Tran Australia
Richard Appiah relative to Sara Wigderson United States Sara Wigderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Sara Wigderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Appiah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Appiah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Appiah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Appiah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Appiah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Appiah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Appiah. The network helps show where Richard Appiah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Richard Appiah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Appiah Line = papers co-authored together Richard Appiah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201890
2 202024
3 202022
4 202019
5 201719
6 201617
7 202111
8 202111
9 20218
10 20228
11 20228
12
Nailfold capillaroscopy and laser Doppler fluxmetry for evaluation of Raynaud's phenomenon: how valid is the local cooling test?
19978
13 20247
14 20245
15 20225
16 20243
17 20213
18 20203
19 20232
20 20202

About Richard Appiah

Richard Appiah is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (78 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (64 citations), Health (26 citations), Applied Psychology (16 citations) and General Health Professions (69 citations). Richard Appiah has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Marié P. Wissing, Lusilda Schutte, Lydia Aziato, Itumeleng P. Khumalo, Samuel A. Danquah, Kingsley Nyarko, Angela Ofori-Atta, Giuseppe Raviola and L Caspary. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, Frontiers in Psychology, Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being, Public health reviews and Journal of Community Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact