Ria Smit

452 citations
25 papers · 287 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ria Smit

22 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Ria Smit
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Safety Research 37
  • Gender Studies 39
  • Clinical Psychology 67
  • General Health Professions 76
  • Sociology and Political Science 143
Replace Kate Pincock with:
Kate Pincock United Kingdom
Amy Finnegan United States
Lorena Núñez South Africa
Carol Bellamy United States
Amy E. Ritterbusch United States
Brenda Hayman Australia
João Manuel de Oliveira Portugal
Aimee Van Wagenen United States
Philomina Okeke‐Ihejirika Canada
Leena Abraham India
Ria Smit relative to Kate Pincock United Kingdom Kate Pincock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Kate Pincock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ria Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ria Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ria Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ria Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ria Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ria Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ria Smit. The network helps show where Ria Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ria Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ria Smit Line = papers co-authored together Ria Smit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200552
2 200140
3 201138
4 201433
5 200223
6 201114
7 201512
8 201111
9 201611
10 200710
11 201510
12 20045
13 20084
14 20084
15 20044
16 20083
17 20193
18 20082
19 19952
20
Students perceiving risk: a quantitative assessment on three South African university campuses
20142

About Ria Smit

Ria Smit is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Education, having authored 25 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (7 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (3 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (37 citations), Gender Studies (39 citations), Clinical Psychology (67 citations), General Health Professions (76 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (143 citations). Ria Smit has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Tina Uys, Jan K. Coetzee, Anne Ryen, Asta Rau and Sarah E. Radloff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Development Southern Africa, Journal of Family Theory & Review, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact