Journal of Family Theory & Review

585 papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 585 papers published in Journal of Family Theory & Review in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Family Theory & Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (309 papers), Social Psychology (215 papers) and Demography (210 papers) specifically the topics of Family Dynamics and Relationships (195 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (128 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Family Theory & Review are Ann S. Masten, Jonathan Tudge, Oriel Sullivan, Sandra Petronio, Edinete María Rosa, Jane F. Gilgun, April Few‐Demo, B. Jan McCulloch, Esther S. Kluwer and Frank D. Fincham.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Family Theory & Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Family Theory & Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Family Theory & Review.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Family Theory & Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Family Theory & Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Family Theory & Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Family Theory & Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025