R.F. Öien

25 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

R.F. Öien
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Occupational Therapy 108
  • Rehabilitation 135
  • Internal Medicine 32
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 84
  • Surgery 183
Replace Veronika Gerber with:
Veronika Gerber Germany
A.G. Jopp-Mckay Australia
Phyllis A. Bonham United States
R. Gary Sibbald Canada
Janice Cameron United Kingdom
Trudie Young United Kingdom
Donna Angel Australia
Yurena Quintana-Marrero Spain
Katerina Damevska North Macedonia
Anna Tedeschi Italy
R.F. Öien relative to Veronika Gerber Germany Veronika Gerber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Veronika Gerber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.F. Öien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.F. Öien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.F. Öien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.F. Öien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.F. Öien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.F. Öien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.F. Öien. The network helps show where R.F. Öien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.F. Öien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.F. Öien Line = papers co-authored together R.F. Öien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200161
2 201349
3 200243
4 201440
5 200037
6 201526
7 200625
8 201822
9 200222
10 199820
11
[Treatment of venous leg ulcers can be better and cheaper. Annual costs calculation based on an inquiry study].
200418
12 201213
13 201410
14 20009
15 20139
16 20208
17
The Swedish national quality Registry of Ulcer Treatment (RUT): How can 'RUT' inform outcome measurement for people diagnosed with venous leg ulcers in Australia?
20148
18 20017
19 20205
20 20225

About R.F. Öien

R.F. Öien is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Pharmacology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (13 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (108 citations), Rehabilitation (135 citations), Internal Medicine (32 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (84 citations) and Surgery (183 citations). R.F. Öien has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bjarne U. Hansen, Anders Håkansson, Henrik Forssell, M Bjellerup, Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall, Annika Håkansson, Cecilia Fagerström, Ingvar Ovhed, Patrik Midlöv and E. I. Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, BMJ Open, International Wound Journal, Acta Dermato Venereologica and Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact