R.F. Öien

25 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

R.F. Öien
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Occupational Therapy 182
  • Rehabilitation 189
  • Internal Medicine 42
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 127
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Graham W Fuller with:
Graham W Fuller United Kingdom
Phyllis A. Bonham United States
Lia van Rijswijk United States
Veronika Gerber Germany
Deyaa Al‐Kurdi United Kingdom
R. Gary Sibbald Canada
A.G. Jopp-Mckay Australia
Trudie Young United Kingdom
J Hoborn Sweden
Shelley‐Ann Walters United States
R.F. Öien relative to Graham W Fuller United Kingdom Graham W Fuller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Graham W Fuller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.F. Öien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.F. Öien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.F. Öien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.F. Öien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.F. Öien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.F. Öien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.F. Öien. The network helps show where R.F. Öien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.F. Öien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.F. Öien Line = papers co-authored together R.F. Öien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200157
2 201346
3 200240
4 201439
5 200037
6 201526
7 200624
8 201822
9 200221
10 199819
11
[Treatment of venous leg ulcers can be better and cheaper. Annual costs calculation based on an inquiry study].
200416
12 201213
13 201410
14 20139
15
The Swedish national quality Registry of Ulcer Treatment (RUT): How can 'RUT' inform outcome measurement for people diagnosed with venous leg ulcers in Australia?
20148
16 20207
17 20017
18 20006
19 20205
20 20224

About R.F. Öien

R.F. Öien is a scholar working on Surgery, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Internal Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (18 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (14 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (11 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (10 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (1 paper) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (182 citations), Rehabilitation (189 citations), Internal Medicine (42 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (127 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). R.F. Öien has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bjarne U. Hansen, Henrik Forssell, Anders Håkansson, M Bjellerup, Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall, Annika Håkansson, Cecilia Fagerström, Ingvar Ovhed, Patrik Midlöv and Tobias C. Olofsson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, BMJ Open, International Wound Journal, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care and Acta Dermato Venereologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact