Rex G. Cates

4.5k citations
50 papers · 2.4k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Rex G. Cates

50 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Rex G. Cates
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 761
  • Soil Science 466
  • Insect Science 486
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 737
  • Ecology 850
Replace Christiane Gallet with:
Christiane Gallet France
Paul B. Reichardt United States
R. S. Shiel United Kingdom
Adrie van der Werf Netherlands
Thomas P. Clausen United States
Inderjit Inderjit India
Thomas Steinger Switzerland
Susana Rodríguez‐Echeverría Portugal
Peter Moutoglis Canada
Yu‐Long Feng China
Rex G. Cates relative to Christiane Gallet France Christiane Gallet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christiane Gallet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rex G. Cates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rex G. Cates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rex G. Cates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rex G. Cates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rex G. Cates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rex G. Cates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rex G. Cates. The network helps show where Rex G. Cates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rex G. Cates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rex G. Cates Line = papers co-authored together Rex G. Cates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975259
2 2001243
3 1988223
4 1980214
5 1996171
6 1998158
7 1971102
8 197798
9 197590
10 198161
11 198758
12 199154
13 198451
14
Elk, multiple factors, and persistence of willows in national parks.
199849
15 199146
16 201445
17 198745
18 199541
19 200539
20 199733

About Rex G. Cates

Rex G. Cates is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (6 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (5 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (761 citations), Soil Science (466 citations), Insect Science (486 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (737 citations) and Ecology (850 citations). Rex G. Cates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Joshua P. Schimel, Gordon H. Orians, John D. Horner, James R. Gosz, Noah Fierer, Richard A. Redak, Roger W. Ruess, Roger del Moral, David F. Rhoades and Paul B. Reichardt. Their work appears in journals such as Oecologia, Pharmaceutical Biology, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact