Reto Auer

3.8k citations
128 papers · 2.4k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Reto Auer

114 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Reto Auer
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 459
  • Pharmacology 260
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 248
  • Physiology 288
  • Surgery 453
Replace Helen C. Looker with:
Helen C. Looker United States
Gregory Grandits United States
Kelly Cho United States
Rachel Dankner Israel
A. Enrique Caballero United States
Jennifer Logue United Kingdom
Carla Yunis United States
Mahmoud Al Rifai United States
Carl Johan Östgren Sweden
Petter Bjornstad United States
Reto Auer relative to Helen C. Looker United States Helen C. Looker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Helen C. Looker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reto Auer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reto Auer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reto Auer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reto Auer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reto Auer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reto Auer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reto Auer. The network helps show where Reto Auer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reto Auer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reto Auer Line = papers co-authored together Reto Auer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008358
2 2017238
3 2018120
4 2015119
5 2015114
6 2016103
7 201687
8 201787
9 201477
10 201352
11 201549
12 201848
13 201947
14 201735
15 202032
16 201531
17 200830
18 201628
19 201728
20 201927

About Reto Auer

Reto Auer is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions and Physiology, having authored 128 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (17 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (15 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (13 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (13 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (459 citations), Pharmacology (260 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (248 citations), Physiology (288 citations) and Surgery (453 citations). Reto Auer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Cornuz, Nicolas Rodondi, David Nanchen, Douglas C. Bauer, Bariş Gencer, Aurélie Berthet, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Isabelle Jacot Sadowski, Nicolas Concha‐Lozano and Mark J. Pletcher. Their work appears in journals such as Preventive Medicine Reports, European Heart Journal, Swiss Medical Weekly, Addiction and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact