Renae D. Schmidt
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 3
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. Feaster (9 shared papers)Viviana E. Horigian (10 shared papers)Richard M. Lee (1 shared paper)Allan Rodríguez (1 shared paper)Lauren Gooden (1 shared paper)Louise Haynes (1 shared paper)Adam W. Carrico (2 shared papers)Petra Jacobs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Public Health (3 papers)Journal of Clinical Medicine (2 papers)Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (1 paper)Critical Public Health (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Renae D. Schmidt
8 papers receiving 298 citations
Renae D. Schmidt's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Clinical Psychology 145
- Applied Psychology 29
- Health 40
- Social Psychology 62
- General Health Professions 54
Countries citing papers authored by Renae D. Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Renae D. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renae D. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renae D. Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renae D. Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renae D. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renae D. Schmidt. The network helps show where Renae D. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Renae D. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Loneliness, Mental Health, and Substance Use among US Young Adults during COVID-19 Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 278 |
| 2 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1955 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 0 |
About Renae D. Schmidt
Renae D. Schmidt is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (145 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Health (40 citations), Social Psychology (62 citations) and General Health Professions (54 citations). Renae D. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Feaster, Viviana E. Horigian, Richard M. Lee, Allan Rodríguez, Lauren Gooden, Louise Haynes, Adam W. Carrico, Petra Jacobs, Ross C. Brownson and WayWay M. Hlaing. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Public Health, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Critical Public Health and Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.