Reid Caplan
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 13
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 7
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
- Co-authors
- John F. Strang (4 shared papers)Meng‐Chuan Lai (1 shared paper)Stephen M. Shore (2 shared papers)Teal Benevides (2 shared papers)Lisa Morgan (2 shared papers)Dena Gassner (2 shared papers)Laura G. Anthony (3 shared papers)Steven S. Coughlin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Autism (5 papers)Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (3 papers)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)American Journal of Occupational Therapy (1 paper)Journal of Interpersonal Violence (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Reid Caplan
12 papers receiving 431 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 356
- Clinical Psychology 289
- Safety Research 53
- Psychiatry and Mental health 86
- Speech and Hearing 32
Countries citing papers authored by Reid Caplan
This map shows the geographic impact of Reid Caplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reid Caplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reid Caplan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Reid Caplan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reid Caplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reid Caplan. The network helps show where Reid Caplan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reid Caplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 |
About Reid Caplan
Reid Caplan is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Safety Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (13 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (7 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (356 citations), Clinical Psychology (289 citations), Safety Research (53 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (86 citations) and Speech and Hearing (32 citations). Reid Caplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John F. Strang, Meng‐Chuan Lai, Stephen M. Shore, Teal Benevides, Lisa Morgan, Dena Gassner, Laura G. Anthony, Steven S. Coughlin, Patricia Duncan and Kate Palmer. Their work appears in journals such as Autism, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry, American Journal of Occupational Therapy and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.