Dena Gassner
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 6
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 2
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
- Co-authors
- Lisa Morgan (2 shared papers)Teal Benevides (2 shared papers)Reid Caplan (3 shared papers)Stephen M. Shore (2 shared papers)Patrick Dwyer (2 shared papers)Zachary J. Williams (2 shared papers)Patricia Duncan (1 shared paper)Kate Palmer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Autism (2 papers)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)Disability and health journal (1 paper)PEDIATRICS (1 paper)Autism Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Dena Gassner
6 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cognitive Neuroscience 222
- Clinical Psychology 166
- Psychiatry and Mental health 59
- Safety Research 20
- Occupational Therapy 9
Countries citing papers authored by Dena Gassner
This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Gassner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Gassner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Gassner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Gassner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Gassner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Gassner. The network helps show where Dena Gassner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Dena Gassner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2026 | 0 |
About Dena Gassner
Dena Gassner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Occupational Therapy, having authored 7 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Disability Rights and Representation (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (222 citations), Clinical Psychology (166 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations), Safety Research (20 citations) and Occupational Therapy (9 citations). Dena Gassner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Morgan, Teal Benevides, Reid Caplan, Stephen M. Shore, Patrick Dwyer, Zachary J. Williams, Patricia Duncan, Kate Palmer, Steven S. Coughlin and Matthew D. Lerner. Their work appears in journals such as Autism, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Disability and health journal, PEDIATRICS and Autism Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.