Reg Lehmann

444 citations
9 papers · 370 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities 6
    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 4
    • Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications 1
    • Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds 6

Reg Lehmann

9 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Reg Lehmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 137
  • Biomaterials 106
  • Biochemistry 25
  • Molecular Biology 267
  • Pharmacology 29
Replace Yang Chong-Ren with:
Yang Chong-Ren China
Eric De Combarieu Italy
Norito Kaneda United States
Chinenye J. Ugwah‐Oguejiofor Nigeria
Sumeer Razdan India
Sílvia Menezes de Faria Pereira Brazil
Mahmood Brobbey Oppong China
Lixia Zhu China
Songsong Jing China
Hing‐Man Ho Hong Kong
Reg Lehmann relative to Yang Chong-Ren China Yang Chong-Ren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yang Chong-Ren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reg Lehmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reg Lehmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reg Lehmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reg Lehmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reg Lehmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reg Lehmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reg Lehmann. The network helps show where Reg Lehmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Reg Lehmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reg Lehmann Line = papers co-authored together Reg Lehmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 200797
2 200657
3 200756
4 200850
5 200640
6 200537
7 200722
8 200610
9 20071

About Reg Lehmann

Reg Lehmann is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Complementary and alternative medicine, Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (6 papers), Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (6 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (2 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (2 papers), Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (1 paper), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (1 paper) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (137 citations), Biomaterials (106 citations), Biochemistry (25 citations), Molecular Biology (267 citations) and Pharmacology (29 citations). Reg Lehmann has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Y. Hayes, William Kitching, James J. De Voss, Kerry G. Penman, Kerry Bone, David N. Leach, A. Matthias, Linda K Banbury and Lynette K. Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Phytochemistry, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, Phytochemical Analysis and Fitoterapia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact