Ray Sin
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Papers in
-
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 2
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 2
- Sex work and related issues 1
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 2
- Gender Politics and Representation 2
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 1
- Co-authors
- William J. Scarborough (3 shared papers)Bárbara J. Risman (3 shared papers)Simon Nilsson (2 shared papers)Maria Krysan (1 shared paper)Kristen Myers (2 shared papers)Yi Wang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gender & Society (2 papers)Sexualities (1 paper)Journal of Consumer Behaviour (1 paper)Sociology of Race and Ethnicity (1 paper)NYU Press eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ray Sin
8 papers receiving 328 citations
Ray Sin's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Gender Studies 190
- Sociology and Political Science 227
- Demography 36
- Health 15
- Marketing 18
Countries citing papers authored by Ray Sin
This map shows the geographic impact of Ray Sin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray Sin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray Sin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ray Sin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray Sin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray Sin. The network helps show where Ray Sin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Ray Sin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016 Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 243 |
| 2 | 2022 | 30 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 0 |
About Ray Sin
Ray Sin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Marketing, Urban Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (190 citations), Sociology and Political Science (227 citations), Demography (36 citations), Health (15 citations) and Marketing (18 citations). Ray Sin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William J. Scarborough, Bárbara J. Risman, Simon Nilsson, Maria Krysan, Kristen Myers and Yi Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & Society, Sexualities, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Sociology of Race and Ethnicity and NYU Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.