Raj Kishore

140 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Peers

Raj Kishore
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Cancer Research 1.4k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.3k
  • Molecular Biology 3.9k
  • Genetics 497
  • Immunology 971
Replace Guo‐Chang Fan with:
Guo‐Chang Fan United States
Giulio Pompilio Italy
Anton Jan van Zonneveld Netherlands
Motokuni Aoki Japan
Maria Felice Brizzi Italy
Masafumi Takahashi Japan
Mark W. Feinberg United States
Giuseppe Vassalli Switzerland
Vicente Andrés Spain
Luigi Giusto Spagnoli Italy
Raj Kishore relative to Guo‐Chang Fan United States Guo‐Chang Fan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Guo‐Chang Fan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Raj Kishore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raj Kishore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raj Kishore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raj Kishore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raj Kishore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raj Kishore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raj Kishore. The network helps show where Raj Kishore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Raj Kishore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Raj Kishore Line = papers co-authored together Raj Kishore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 146 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011490
2 2008349
3 2009282
4 2017276
5 2006203
6 2016171
7 2012167
8 2006165
9 2012151
10 2016149
11 2020147
12 2006140
13 2006129
14 2002127
15 2019126
16 2011119
17 2002116
18 2010101
19 200196
20 201796

About Raj Kishore

Raj Kishore is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cancer Research, Immunology and Surgery, having authored 146 papers that have together received 7.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Extracellular vesicles in disease (22 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (20 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (18 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (11 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (9 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (8 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (7 papers) and NF-κB Signaling Pathways (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.4k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k citations), Molecular Biology (3.9k citations), Genetics (497 citations) and Immunology (971 citations). Raj Kishore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and India. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Losordo, Gangjian Qin, Prasanna Krishnamurthy, Tina Thorne, Mohsin Khan, Suresh K Verma, Erin Lambers, Venkata Naga Srikanth Garikipati, Megan R. McMullen and Laura E. Nagy. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation Research, Circulation, PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact