Rachel E. Davis

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Rachel E. Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Pharmacy 62
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • General Health Professions 204
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 228
  • Clinical Psychology 160
Replace Caroline Fichtenberg with:
Caroline Fichtenberg United States
Jennifer A. Jewell United States
Charlie Davison United Kingdom
Carla Meurk Australia
Karen Graves United States
Nadine Peacock United States
Jianghong Li Australia
Robert Aronowitz United States
Michael Yudell United States
Shireen S. Rajaram United States
Rachel E. Davis relative to Caroline Fichtenberg United States Caroline Fichtenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Caroline Fichtenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Davis. The network helps show where Rachel E. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel E. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel E. Davis Line = papers co-authored together Rachel E. Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009254
2 2006247
3 1995138
4 201061
5 202335
6 201332
7 202031
8 200030
9 201927
10 201426
11 202123
12 201822
13 201121
14 201620
15 201120
16 202120
17 201219
18 201016
19 202015
20 201612

About Rachel E. Davis

Rachel E. Davis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (62 citations), Applied Psychology (47 citations), General Health Professions (204 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (228 citations) and Clinical Psychology (160 citations). Rachel E. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Ken Resnicow, Stephen Rollnick, Ken Resnicow, Mick P. Couper, Nancy K. Janz, Cleopatra H. Caldwell, Jeffrey K. Conner, Scott Rush, Karen E. Peterson and Timothy P. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Field Methods, Appetite, Journal of Health Communication, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences and Journal of Religion and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact