R. Stone

64.9k citations
89 papers · 52.4k · 22 hit papers · h-index 61

Impact in

    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Relativity and Gravitational Theory
    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
    • Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
    • Nuclear physics research studies

Papers in

R. Stone

89 papers receiving 51.3k citations

R. Stone's Hit Papers

GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M ⊙ 2020 · 1.4k citations
1.4k0+3+6Years since publication2.5k5k7.5k

Peers

R. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 45.3k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 9k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.2k
  • Instrumentation 265
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.7k
Replace Alex L. Urban with:
Alex L. Urban United States
Richard J. Oram United States
S. McCormick United States
S. Karki United States
J. Hanson United States
Jordan R. Palamos United States
E. L. Merilh United States
E. J. Sanchez United States
Jason Oberling United States
Craig Cahillane United States
R. Stone relative to Alex L. Urban United States Alex L. Urban's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alex L. Urban · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Stone. The network helps show where R. Stone may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Hit paper breakdown →
201610805
2
GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral
Hit paper breakdown →
20177690
3
GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs
Hit paper breakdown →
20192945
4
Advanced LIGO
Hit paper breakdown →
20152886
5
GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence
Hit paper breakdown →
20162792
6
Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A
Hit paper breakdown →
20172783
7
GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State
Hit paper breakdown →
20182025
8
GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence
Hit paper breakdown →
20171682
9
Tests of General Relativity with GW150914
Hit paper breakdown →
20161461
10
GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M ⊙
Hit paper breakdown →
20201392
11
Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817
Hit paper breakdown →
20191075
12
Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors
Hit paper breakdown →
2017997
13
GW170608: Observation of a 19 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence
Hit paper breakdown →
2017997
14
Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA
Hit paper breakdown →
2018987
15
A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant
Hit paper breakdown →
2017957
16
Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Hit paper breakdown →
2010934
17
Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914
Hit paper breakdown →
2016815
18
A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit
Hit paper breakdown →
2011724
19
Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1
Hit paper breakdown →
2019696
20
ASTROPHYSICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGER GW150914
Hit paper breakdown →
2016654

About R. Stone

R. Stone is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 89 papers that have together received 52.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (89 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (45.3k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (9k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.2k citations), Instrumentation (265 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.7k citations). R. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact