R. Pill
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Policy Implementation Science
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 1
- Health, psychology, and well-being 1
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 1
- Oncology 2
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher Butler (1 shared paper)Steve Rollnick (1 shared paper)M. Rees (1 shared paper)Paul Kinnersley (1 shared paper)Michael Robling (3 shared papers)Kerenza Hood (2 shared papers)H. M. Evans (1 shared paper)Joanna Fay (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Family Practice (2 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (1 paper)Quality of Life Research (1 paper)European Journal of Cancer Care (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. Pill
8 papers receiving 520 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Family Practice 23
- General Health Professions 263
- Applied Psychology 48
- Pharmacy 34
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 194
Countries citing papers authored by R. Pill
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Pill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Pill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Pill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Pill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Pill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Pill. The network helps show where R. Pill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside R. Pill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 129 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 117 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 111 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 91 | |
| 5 | ACCESSIBILITY AND UTILIZATION : GEOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON HEALTH CARE DELIVERY | 1984 | 58 |
| 6 | Potential of using simulated patients to study the performance of general practitioners. | 1993 | 40 |
| 7 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 5 |
About R. Pill
R. Pill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Health, psychology, and well-being (1 paper), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper) and Diabetes Management and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (23 citations), General Health Professions (263 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations), Pharmacy (34 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (194 citations). R. Pill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Butler, Steve Rollnick, M. Rees, Paul Kinnersley, Michael Robling, Kerenza Hood, H. M. Evans, Joanna Fay, Helen Houston and Clare Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Family Practice, Journal of Medical Ethics, Quality of Life Research, European Journal of Cancer Care and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.