R. Halliday

39 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

R. Halliday
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Small Animals 266
  • Equine 38
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 189
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 169
  • Immunology 158
Replace Robert W. Bull with:
Robert W. Bull United States
Fumio Hoshi Japan
Yoshihisa NAITO Japan
Isamu Tomoda Japan
E. A. Usenik United States
K. Nordstoga Norway
R. K. Archer United Kingdom
Mark H. Roberts United Kingdom
T. Matsui Japan
Katsuya KITOH Japan
R. Halliday relative to Robert W. Bull United States Robert W. Bull's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Robert W. Bull · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Halliday. The network helps show where R. Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside R. Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Halliday Line = papers co-authored together R. Halliday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1955133
2 1959117
3 195678
4 195863
5 195558
6 195636
7 197836
8 195831
9 195428
10 197426
11 196823
12 195722
13 197821
14 197621
15
Variation in immunoglobulin transfer from ewes to lambs.
197820
16 196819
17 196016
18 196116
19 196515
20 197115

About R. Halliday

R. Halliday is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Molecular Biology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 934 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal health and immunology (18 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (14 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers), Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment (4 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (3 papers) and Protein purification and stability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (266 citations), Equine (38 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (189 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (169 citations) and Immunology (158 citations). R. Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include F. W. Rogers Brambell, Ian Morris, R. A. Kekwick, J. Slee, M.R. Williams, W. A. Hemmings, A. J. F. Russel, Jason N. Peart, A. R. Sykes and A. C. Field. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Veterinary Science, The Journal of Agricultural Science, Animal Science, Journal of Endocrinology and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact