A. C. Field

2.4k citations
98 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

A. C. Field

96 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

A. C. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 912
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 691
  • Animal Science and Zoology 373
  • Small Animals 249
  • Genetics 478
Replace E. J. Underwood with:
E. J. Underwood Australia
J.K. Loosli United States
R. H. Smith United States
J. A. F. Rook United Kingdom
I. W. McDonald Slovakia
J.C. MacRae United Kingdom
E. Pfeffer Germany
E. E. Hatfield United States
W. M. Beeson United States
R. L. Preston United States
A. C. Field relative to E. J. Underwood Australia E. J. Underwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
E. J. Underwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. C. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Field. The network helps show where A. C. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. C. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. C. Field Line = papers co-authored together A. C. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195894
2 196887
3 196760
4 197560
5 198357
6 196057
7 196956
8 197255
9 197351
10 196848
11
A reappraisal of the calcium and phosphorus requirements of sheep and cattle
199146
12 198341
13 198340
14 197238
15 196138
16 198337
17 198137
18 198336
19 196932
20 197832

About A. C. Field

A. C. Field is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Plant Science, having authored 98 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (33 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (31 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (23 papers), Trace Elements in Health (19 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (12 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (12 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (7 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (912 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (691 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (373 citations), Small Animals (249 citations) and Genetics (478 citations). A. C. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include N. F. Suttle, A. R. Sykes, G. Wiener, John Woolliams, Gerald Wiener, B.S.W. Smith, D.I. Nisbet, E.J. Butler, R.L. Coop and R. G. Gunn. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Agricultural Science, Journal of Comparative Pathology, British Journal Of Nutrition, Animal Science and Proceedings of The Nutrition Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact