R. E. Vesley

755 citations
9 papers · 364 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

R. E. Vesley

8 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

R. E. Vesley
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Theoretical Computer Science 52
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 263
  • Geometry and Topology 62
  • Artificial Intelligence 228
  • Mathematical Physics 40
Replace Wolfram Pohlers with:
Wolfram Pohlers Germany
Wilfried Buchholz Germany
Akiko Kino Ghana
J. W. Addison United States
D. van Dalen Netherlands
Albert Visser Netherlands
Kosta Došen Serbia
R. O. Gandy United Kingdom
Harvey Friedman United States
Erik Palmgren Sweden
R. E. Vesley relative to Wolfram Pohlers Germany Wolfram Pohlers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Wolfram Pohlers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. E. Vesley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. E. Vesley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. E. Vesley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. E. Vesley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. E. Vesley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. E. Vesley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. E. Vesley. The network helps show where R. E. Vesley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside R. E. Vesley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. E. Vesley Line = papers co-authored together R. E. Vesley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Intuitionism and Proof Theory
1970190
2 196777
3
The foundations of intuitionistic mathematics : especially in relation to recursive functions
196575
4 19989
5 19965
6 19994
7 19832
8 19791
9 19631

About R. E. Vesley

R. E. Vesley is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Theoretical Computer Science and Education, having authored 9 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (52 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (263 citations), Geometry and Topology (62 citations), Artificial Intelligence (228 citations) and Mathematical Physics (40 citations). R. E. Vesley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Myhill, Akiko Kino, Stephen C Kleene, Henry E. Kyburg, S. C. Kleene and Andre Scedrov. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Archive for Mathematical Logic, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic and History and Philosophy of Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact