Qin Cui

1.3k citations
37 papers · 978 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health 3
    • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 2

Qin Cui

37 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

Qin Cui
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Genetics 111
  • Clinical Psychology 119
  • Surgery 212
  • Transplantation 13
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Mark A. Young with:
Mark A. Young United States
Ertuğrul Çolak Türkiye
Luis Marcelo Pereira United States
Pascal Schlosser Germany
Stéphanie Woerner United States
Fakhredin A. Sayed‐Tabatabaei Netherlands
Samim Özen Türkiye
Neeraj Tandon United States
Qin Cui relative to Mark A. Young United States Mark A. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5.0×
Mark A. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Qin Cui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Qin Cui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qin Cui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qin Cui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Qin Cui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qin Cui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qin Cui. The network helps show where Qin Cui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Qin Cui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Qin Cui Line = papers co-authored together Qin Cui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020131
2 2010121
3 2018104
4 2006104
5 201549
6 201741
7 200931
8 201430
9 201930
10 202029
11 202427
12 200927
13 201522
14 200822
15 201920
16 200720
17 202017
18 200717
19 200917
20 201015

About Qin Cui

Qin Cui is a scholar working on Surgery, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (2 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (111 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations), Surgery (212 citations), Transplantation (13 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Qin Cui has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jun Zhang, Shiqiang Yu, Gaohua Wang, Dinghua Yi, Juanjuan Li, Zhongchun Liu, Zhongxiang Cai, Chuang Chen, Heping Zhou and Hanzhao Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Current Neurovascular Research, Journal of the American Heart Association, BMJ Open and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact