Qi‐En Yang

59 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Qi‐En Yang's Hit Papers

An early warning signal for grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau 2023 · 149 citations
1490+1+2Years since publication4080120

Peers

Qi‐En Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Reproductive Medicine 700
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 662
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 218
  • Genetics 520
  • Cancer Research 183
Replace Peng Jia with:
Peng Jia China
W. Allan King Canada
Corinne Cotinot France
Olivier D’Amours Canada
Bernard J. Vigier France
Humphrey Hung‐Chang Yao United States
James F. Matta United States
P.A. Pugh New Zealand
Ge Lin China
Bo He China
Qi‐En Yang relative to Peng Jia China Peng Jia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Peng Jia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Qi‐En Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Qi‐En Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qi‐En Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qi‐En Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Qi‐En Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qi‐En Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qi‐En Yang. The network helps show where Qi‐En Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Qi‐En Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Qi‐En Yang Line = papers co-authored together Qi‐En Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017160
2 2012155
3
An early warning signal for grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
Hit paper breakdown →
2023149
4 2012145
5 201290
6 200974
7 201464
8 201658
9 200857
10 202354
11 201154
12 201351
13 202045
14 202244
15 202039
16 200539
17 201135
18 201231
19 201728
20 202027

About Qi‐En Yang

Qi‐En Yang is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (29 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (28 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (14 papers), Renal and related cancers (8 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (7 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (5 papers) and Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (700 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (662 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (218 citations), Genetics (520 citations) and Cancer Research (183 citations). Qi‐En Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jon Michael Oatley, Melissa J. Oatley, Alan D. Ealy, Amy V. Kaucher, Karen E. Racicot, Dong-Won Kim, Ming‐Han Tong, Fred Sablitzky, Tessa Lord and Manabu Ozawa. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Theriogenology, Reproduction, Development and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact