Priya Chacko

885 citations
44 papers · 538 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Priya Chacko

39 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Priya Chacko
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Development 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 335
  • Sociology and Political Science 261
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 43
  • Anthropology 43
Replace Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung with:
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Bosnia and Herzegovina
Pratap Bhanu Mehta United States
Louise Tillin United Kingdom
Julia C. Strauss United Kingdom
Julius E. Nyang’oro United States
Eduardo Silva United States
Harry E. Vanden United States
Radhika Desai Canada
Howard Handelman United States
H. van der Wusten Netherlands
Priya Chacko relative to Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Bosnia and Herzegovina Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.5×
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Priya Chacko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Priya Chacko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Priya Chacko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Priya Chacko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Priya Chacko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Priya Chacko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Priya Chacko. The network helps show where Priya Chacko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Priya Chacko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Priya Chacko Line = papers co-authored together Priya Chacko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018133
2 201839
3 201837
4 201731
5 201730
6 201130
7 202028
8 201427
9 201324
10 202012
11 201611
12 202110
13 201010
14 201510
15
New Regional Geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific : Drivers, dynamics and consequences
20169
16 20239
17 20149
18 20139
19 20148
20 20197

About Priya Chacko

Priya Chacko is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Development, having authored 44 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers), Indian Economic and Social Development (8 papers), Global trade and economics (7 papers), International Development and Aid (7 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (7 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (7 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (6 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (72 citations), Political Science and International Relations (335 citations), Sociology and Political Science (261 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (43 citations) and Anthropology (43 citations). Priya Chacko has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kanishka Jayasuriya, Peter Mayer, Jeffrey D. Wilson, Sheila A. Smith and Kei Koga. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal Of International Affairs, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Review of International Studies, The Pacific Review and The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact