Pratikshya Kandel

477 citations
11 papers · 346 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Pratikshya Kandel

11 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Pratikshya Kandel
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Ecological Modeling 47
  • Global and Planetary Change 210
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 59
  • Ecology 102
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
Replace Suraj Upadhaya with:
Suraj Upadhaya United States
Meshack Nyabenge Kenya
Juan Carlos Ledezma United States
Kerstin Jantke Germany
Rajesh Thadani India
José Aragón-Osejo United States
Ruppert Vimal France
Muhammad Arif Goheer Pakistan
Malte Busch Germany
Shimona A. Quazi United States
Pratikshya Kandel relative to Suraj Upadhaya United States Suraj Upadhaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Suraj Upadhaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pratikshya Kandel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pratikshya Kandel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pratikshya Kandel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pratikshya Kandel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pratikshya Kandel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pratikshya Kandel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pratikshya Kandel. The network helps show where Pratikshya Kandel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Pratikshya Kandel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pratikshya Kandel Line = papers co-authored together Pratikshya Kandel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201870
2 202146
3 201640
4 201536
5 202036
6 201935
7 201830
8 202221
9 201918
10 201812
11 20242

About Pratikshya Kandel

Pratikshya Kandel is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Sociology and Political Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 11 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (1 paper), Energy and Environment Impacts (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (47 citations), Global and Planetary Change (210 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (59 citations), Ecology (102 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations). Pratikshya Kandel has collaborated with scholars based in Nepal, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Nakul Chettri, Kabir Uddin, Kamal Aryal, Eklabya Sharma, Prem Sagar Chapagain, Lila Nath Sharma, Ole R. Vetaas, Janita Gurung, Sunita Chaudhary and Wu Ning. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, World Development, Avian Research, Plant Diversity and Small-scale Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact