Po‐Han Lin

578 citations
20 papers · 473 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Po‐Han Lin

20 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Po‐Han Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Reproductive Medicine 98
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Pharmacology 49
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 25
  • Nephrology 26
Replace Dean P. Jones with:
Dean P. Jones United States
Neşe Başak Türkiye
Clara Ortega‐Camarillo Mexico
Claudia Anzivino Italy
Baiye Jin China
Pushplata Sankhwar India
Horng-Mo Lee Taiwan
Yingchun Zhang China
Tz‐Chong Chou Taiwan
Po‐Han Lin relative to Dean P. Jones United States Dean P. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Dean P. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Po‐Han Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Po‐Han Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Po‐Han Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Po‐Han Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Po‐Han Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Po‐Han Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Po‐Han Lin. The network helps show where Po‐Han Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Po‐Han Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Po‐Han Lin Line = papers co-authored together Po‐Han Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202267
2 202057
3 201940
4 201940
5 201938
6 202033
7 201930
8 202029
9 201928
10 201925
11 201919
12 202017
13 200913
14 201611
15 20189
16 20205
17 20215
18 20123
19 20232
20
Composite graft tear and aortico-left ventricular tunnel after aortic root replacement using Cabrol's technique.
20002

About Po‐Han Lin

Po‐Han Lin is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pharmacology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 20 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (3 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper) and Menstrual Health and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (98 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Pharmacology (49 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (25 citations) and Nephrology (26 citations). Po‐Han Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Shih‐Min Hsia, Y-H. Chen, Yi-Fen Chiang, Tsui‐Chin Huang, Kai-Lee Wang, Tzong‐Ming Shieh, Chun‐Kuang Shih, Muh‐Hwa Yang, Dennis Shin‐Shian Hsu and Shyh‐Kuan Tai. Their work appears in journals such as Antioxidants, Scientific Reports, Cancers, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Biology of Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact