Pip Jones

569 citations
11 papers · 343 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Pip Jones

11 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Pip Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 98
  • Cultural Studies 52
  • Statistics and Probability 28
  • Education 95
  • Sociology and Political Science 111
Replace Feyisa Demie with:
Feyisa Demie United Kingdom
Klaus-Jürgen Tillmann Germany
Deborah Woo United States
Guy Roberts‐Holmes United Kingdom
M. Beatriz Arias United States
Giancarlo Gasperoni Italy
Ann Cheryl Armstrong Australia
Eileen Winter United Kingdom
Alan Hodkinson United Kingdom
Roland Meighan United Kingdom
Pip Jones relative to Feyisa Demie United Kingdom Feyisa Demie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Feyisa Demie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pip Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pip Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pip Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pip Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pip Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pip Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pip Jones. The network helps show where Pip Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Pip Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pip Jones Line = papers co-authored together Pip Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2009105
2
Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial
201663
3 199652
4
Pengantar teori-teori sosial: dari teori fungsionalisme hingga Post-modernisme
200946
5 201928
6
Introducing Social Theory
200325
7
Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial: Dari Fungsionalisme Hingga Post-modernisme
200917
8
Pengantar teori-teori sosial : dari teori fungsionalisme hingga post-modernisme = Introducing social theory
20103
9 19982
10
The Castles and Coltheart Test 2 (CC2)
20091
11
Macquarie Online Test Interface (MOTIf)
20081

About Pip Jones

Pip Jones is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Artificial Intelligence and Demography, having authored 11 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Administration in Developing Nations (4 papers), Islamic Finance and Communication (3 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (1 paper), Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper), SMEs Development and Digital Marketing (1 paper), Text Readability and Simplification (1 paper), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (1 paper) and Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (98 citations), Cultural Studies (52 citations), Statistics and Probability (28 citations), Education (95 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (111 citations). Pip Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne Castles, Genevieve McArthur, Max Coltheart, Linda Larsen, David B. Skinner, Andrew R. Webster, Kevin Bonnett, Michelle Stanworth, Anthony Kucernak and George J. P. Britovsek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Catalysis and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact