Pin‐Ru Chen

698 citations
18 papers · 546 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Pin‐Ru Chen

17 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Pin‐Ru Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • General Decision Sciences 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 203
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
  • Clinical Psychology 73
Replace Chia-Yi Liu with:
Chia-Yi Liu Taiwan
Kyung-Eun Park South Korea
Nicola Knight United Kingdom
Jiayu Li China
Francis J. Tinney United States
Yen‐Jung Chen Taiwan
Tiantian Liu China
Andreas Schneider Germany
Eva-Maria Graf Germany
Pin‐Ru Chen relative to Chia-Yi Liu Taiwan Chia-Yi Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Chia-Yi Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pin‐Ru Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pin‐Ru Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pin‐Ru Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pin‐Ru Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pin‐Ru Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pin‐Ru Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pin‐Ru Chen. The network helps show where Pin‐Ru Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pin‐Ru Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pin‐Ru Chen Line = papers co-authored together Pin‐Ru Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201296
2 201590
3 201690
4 201554
5 201438
6 202125
7 202124
8 202223
9 202118
10 201617
11 202214
12 202113
13 202013
14 202110
15 202210
16 20149
17 20232
18 20240

About Pin‐Ru Chen

Pin‐Ru Chen is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (2 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (2 papers) and Perovskite Materials and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (74 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (203 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations) and Clinical Psychology (73 citations). Pin‐Ru Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hsueh‐Shih Chen, Xiaoyi Fang, Jintao Zhang, Yuan‐Wei Yao, Linyuan Deng, Sarah W. Yip, Qinxue Liu, Chang‐Wei Yeh, Feng‐Yu Chiang and Chia‐Hua Liang. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Applied Nano Materials, Nanomaterials, Psychiatry Research, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact