Pingping Xiang

21 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Pingping Xiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Cancer Research 169
  • Genetics 50
  • Molecular Biology 323
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 39
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 49
Replace Qingju Li with:
Qingju Li China
Qunchao Ma China
Kenta Ujifuku Japan
Takerra Johnson United States
Adèle Richart France
Meiqian Xu China
Tetsushi Nakao United States
Rachel Masson United Kingdom
Lingping Zhu China
Denizhan Ozdemir United States
Pingping Xiang relative to Qingju Li China Qingju Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Qingju Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pingping Xiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pingping Xiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pingping Xiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pingping Xiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pingping Xiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pingping Xiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pingping Xiang. The network helps show where Pingping Xiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pingping Xiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pingping Xiang Line = papers co-authored together Pingping Xiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017235
2 202074
3 202026
4 202125
5 201918
6 202018
7 202116
8 202112
9 20247
10 20196
11 20226
12 20246
13 20225
14 20245
15 20234
16 20234
17 20243
18 20233
19 20192
20 20231

About Pingping Xiang

Pingping Xiang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cancer Research, Surgery and Nephrology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (4 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (1 paper), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (169 citations), Genetics (50 citations), Molecular Biology (323 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (39 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (49 citations). Pingping Xiang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Yinuo Lin, Hong Yu, Jian Shen, Yun Zhao, Jinyun Zhu, Jinghai Chen, Xinyang Hu, Wei Zhu, Kai Lü and Qunchao Ma. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nanomedicine, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Thyroid and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact