Ping-ping Wang

817 citations
18 papers · 739 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ping-ping Wang

16 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Ping-ping Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Polymers and Plastics 293
  • Biomedical Engineering 574
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 206
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 206
  • Bioengineering 20
Replace Zhengjian Zhang with:
Zhengjian Zhang China
Zhuomin Zhang Hong Kong
Yinan Huang China
In-Hwan Kim South Korea
Hongye Chen China
Wook Choi South Korea
Chenying Wang China
Chunkai Wang China
Areum Kim South Korea
Siming Li China
Ping-ping Wang relative to Zhengjian Zhang China Zhengjian Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Zhengjian Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping-ping Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping-ping Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping-ping Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping-ping Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping-ping Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping-ping Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping-ping Wang. The network helps show where Ping-ping Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping-ping Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping-ping Wang Line = papers co-authored together Ping-ping Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2017171
2 2017107
3 2018100
4 201999
5 201786
6 202077
7 201834
8 201823
9 201821
10 20128
11 20205
12 20123
13 20232
14 20121
15 20191
16 20111
17 20250
18 20090

About Ping-ping Wang

Ping-ping Wang is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Polymers and Plastics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (8 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (2 papers), Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies (2 papers), High-Voltage Power Transmission Systems (2 papers), Power Systems Fault Detection (2 papers) and Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (293 citations), Biomedical Engineering (574 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (206 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (206 citations) and Bioengineering (20 citations). Ping-ping Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shuqi Liu, Lan Liu, Song Chen, Haizhou Liu, Yunhui Wu, Zhi‐fu Deng, Yong Lin, Yong Wei, Rongmin Zheng and Songshan Zeng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Materials Letters, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, New Phytologist and Journal of Materials Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact