Ping‐Jen Chen

64 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Ping‐Jen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 57
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 383
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 121
  • Urology 44
  • Physiology 87
Replace Joanne M. McGloin with:
Joanne M. McGloin United States
Seong-Hi Park South Korea
J Reinken New Zealand
Daniel L. Swagerty United States
Karolina Piotrowicz Poland
Hyuk Ga South Korea
Lisha Hou China
Susan L. Hartmaier United States
Mary Shelkey United States
Dick Bijl Netherlands
Ping‐Jen Chen relative to Joanne M. McGloin United States Joanne M. McGloin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Joanne M. McGloin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Jen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Jen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Jen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Jen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Jen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Jen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Jen Chen. The network helps show where Ping‐Jen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Jen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Jen Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Jen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201775
2 201262
3 201256
4 201550
5 201545
6 202045
7 201543
8 202339
9 201836
10 201535
11 201930
12 201728
13 202027
14 201426
15 201726
16 201924
17 201823
18 201422
19 202021
20
Primary Sjögren's Syndrome and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Study.
201319

About Ping‐Jen Chen

Ping‐Jen Chen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Health, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (38 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (57 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (383 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (121 citations), Urology (44 citations) and Physiology (87 citations). Ping‐Jen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Shao‐Yi Cheng, Chung‐Han Ho, Cheng‐Pei Lin, Chien‐Cheng Huang, Ming‐Ping Wu, Shih‐Feng Weng, Sarah Tamsin Pendlebury, Peter Malcolm Rothwell, Ziyah Mehta and Jhi‐Joung Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMC Geriatrics, PLoS ONE and Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact