Ping‐Jen Chen

59 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

Ping‐Jen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 34
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 220
  • Urology 37
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 21
  • Nephrology 27
Replace Petra Jellema with:
Petra Jellema Netherlands
Julia Patrick Engkasan Malaysia
James Bernard Walsh Ireland
Sofía Bauer Israel
P. Patapis Greece
Ken Covinsky United States
Jae Ho Chung South Korea
Senthil P Kumar India
Kee‐Hsin Chen Taiwan
Emma Maund United Kingdom
Ping‐Jen Chen relative to Petra Jellema Netherlands Petra Jellema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Petra Jellema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Jen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Jen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Jen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Jen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Jen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Jen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Jen Chen. The network helps show where Ping‐Jen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Jen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Jen Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Jen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201767
2 201259
3 201253
4 201544
5 201542
6 202041
7 201538
8 201835
9 201535
10 201930
11 202329
12 202027
13 201727
14 201726
15 201425
16 201823
17 201421
18
Primary Sjögren's Syndrome and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Study.
201319
19 202115
20 201615

About Ping‐Jen Chen

Ping‐Jen Chen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Surgery, having authored 63 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (22 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (34 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (220 citations), Urology (37 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (21 citations) and Nephrology (27 citations). Ping‐Jen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Chung‐Han Ho, Shao‐Yi Cheng, Cheng‐Pei Lin, Chien‐Cheng Huang, Ming‐Ping Wu, Shih‐Feng Weng, Peter M. Rothwell, Ziyah Mehta, Sarah T. Pendlebury and Jhi‐Joung Wang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, BMC Geriatrics, Journal of Palliative Medicine and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact