Ping‐Chung Kuo

4.3k citations
171 papers · 3.6k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 27
    • Phytochemical compounds biological activities 23
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 28

Ping‐Chung Kuo

165 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Ping‐Chung Kuo
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Pharmacology 573
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 495
  • Horticulture 61
  • Biochemistry 261
  • Biochemistry 308
Replace Rachel Mata with:
Rachel Mata Mexico
Qing‐Wen Shi China
Jun Luo China
Patoomratana Tuchinda Thailand
Jih‐Jung Chen Taiwan
Phan Văn Kiệm Vietnam
Ih‐Sheng Chen Taiwan
Cindy K. Angerhofer United States
Reiko Tanaka Japan
Hiromasa Kiyota Japan
Ping‐Chung Kuo relative to Rachel Mata Mexico Rachel Mata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Rachel Mata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Chung Kuo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Chung Kuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Chung Kuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Chung Kuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Chung Kuo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Chung Kuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Chung Kuo. The network helps show where Ping‐Chung Kuo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping‐Chung Kuo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping‐Chung Kuo Line = papers co-authored together Ping‐Chung Kuo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 171 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003169
2 2003152
3 2007111
4 2011108
5 201486
6 200585
7 200581
8 200474
9 201270
10 201066
11 201262
12 201261
13 201359
14 201257
15 200656
16 201053
17 200352
18 201750
19 200749
20 201748

About Ping‐Chung Kuo

Ping‐Chung Kuo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Biochemistry, having authored 171 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (28 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (27 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (25 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (23 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (18 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (16 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (13 papers) and Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (573 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (495 citations), Horticulture (61 citations), Biochemistry (261 citations) and Biochemistry (308 citations). Ping‐Chung Kuo has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Vietnam and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tian-Shung Wu, Amooru G. Damu, Tsong‐Long Hwang, Kuo‐Hsiung Lee, Chung-Ren Su, Mei-Lin Yang, Jason T. C. Tzen, Trân Đình Thăng, Yue‐Chiun Li and Hsin‐Yi Hung. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Journal of Natural Products, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact