Ping Zuo

484 citations
18 papers · 356 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Zuo

18 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Ping Zuo
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 144
  • Biochemistry 21
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 45
  • Immunology and Allergy 12
Replace Emily J. Gilles with:
Emily J. Gilles United States
María de la Fuente‐Fernández Spain
Masako Yamada Japan
Luciano Fernandes Brazil
Nozomi Kawakami Japan
Chan Zhang China
William Crawford United States
Meng‐Qiu Li China
David Cunningham United States
Yan Ting Zhao China
Ping Zuo relative to Emily J. Gilles United States Emily J. Gilles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21×
Emily J. Gilles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Zuo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Zuo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Zuo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Zuo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Zuo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Zuo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Zuo. The network helps show where Ping Zuo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Zuo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Zuo Line = papers co-authored together Ping Zuo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2020151
2 201435
3 200624
4 199523
5 200619
6 199718
7 200516
8 201214
9 200711
10 200710
11 20058
12 20066
13 19955
14 20075
15 20175
16 20002
17 20062
18 20212

About Ping Zuo

Ping Zuo is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (3 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (2 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (2 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (2 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (2 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (11 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (144 citations), Biochemistry (21 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (45 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (12 citations). Ping Zuo has collaborated with scholars based in China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Xiaoyun Yang, Fan Lin, Jia Ding, Jingyi Wang, Cheng Cheng, Ye Yuan, Beitong Zhou, Guohua Wan, Yulong Xiong and Hongling Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Trace Element Research, Chemical Physics Letters, Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, American Heart Journal and Photosynthesis Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact