William Crawford

20 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

William Crawford
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pharmacology 141
  • Toxicology 21
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 78
  • Ophthalmology 27
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 64
Replace Liemin Zhou with:
Liemin Zhou China
T. Mellstrand Sweden
Steven M. Toler United States
T. Krause Germany
Xiaodan Liu China
Pascale Vergne‐Salle France
Amparo Buenestado France
Michelle Kovacs United States
Boris Piskoun United States
Ming Xiong United States
William Crawford relative to Liemin Zhou China Liemin Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Liemin Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Crawford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Crawford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Crawford. The network helps show where William Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Crawford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Crawford Line = papers co-authored together William Crawford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980122
2 202060
3 201745
4
Effects of tetrahydrocannabinol on arterial and intraocular hypertension.
197945
5 201441
6 196424
7 200821
8 201418
9
Circulating plasma microRNA-126, microRNA-145, and microRNA-155 and their association with atherosclerotic plaque characteristics.
202016
10 20246
11 20205
12 20175
13 20155
14 20214
15 20213
16 19793
17 20202
18 20201
19 20251
20 20191

About William Crawford

William Crawford is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (141 citations), Toxicology (21 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (78 citations), Ophthalmology (27 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (64 citations). William Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J C Merritt, Alfred Anduze, Sam Grigg, Jack W. O’Sullivan, Erik Ingelsson, Matthew T. Wheeler, John P. A. Ioannidis, Marco Pérez, Euan A. Ashley and Mintu P. Turakhia. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Scientific Data, Genes & Cancer and Familial Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact