Ping Wu
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
- Horticulture top 5%
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 22
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 11
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 7
- Pharmacology 38
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 33
- Fungal Biology and Applications 23
- Co-authors
- Xiaoyi Wei (70 shared papers)Liangxiong Xu (28 shared papers)Jinghua Xue (40 shared papers)Zi‐Hua Jiang (7 shared papers)Hanxiang Li (25 shared papers)Haihui Xie (11 shared papers)Ahmed Mahal (4 shared papers)Yueming Jiang (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (11 papers)The Journal of Antibiotics (6 papers)Phytochemistry (5 papers)Food Chemistry (5 papers)Natural Products and Bioprospecting (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ping Wu
96 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Pharmacology 545
- Horticulture 23
- Biotechnology 182
- Biochemistry 112
- Toxicology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Ping Wu
This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Wu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Wu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Wu. The network helps show where Ping Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 95 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 62 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 50 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 25 |
About Ping Wu
Ping Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (33 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (23 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (22 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (15 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (11 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (10 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (10 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (545 citations), Horticulture (23 citations), Biotechnology (182 citations), Biochemistry (112 citations) and Toxicology (53 citations). Ping Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xiaoyi Wei, Liangxiong Xu, Jinghua Xue, Zi‐Hua Jiang, Hanxiang Li, Haihui Xie, Ahmed Mahal, Yueming Jiang, Wanhui Ye and Jingfang Shi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, The Journal of Antibiotics, Phytochemistry, Food Chemistry and Natural Products and Bioprospecting.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.