Ping Wen

410 citations
18 papers · 325 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 3
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 4
    • Plant chemical constituents analysis 2

Ping Wen

18 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Ping Wen
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Rehabilitation 33
  • Oncology 116
  • Cancer Research 40
  • Immunology 54
  • Biomaterials 33
Replace Aline Beckenkamp with:
Aline Beckenkamp Brazil
Shushu Zhao China
Chunhui Yang China
Jingbo Yang China
Sudhanshu Sharma India
Jiawei Guo China
Diana Tavares‐Valente Portugal
Chenming Zou China
Nastaran Masoudi-Khoram Iran
Ping Wen relative to Aline Beckenkamp Brazil Aline Beckenkamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Aline Beckenkamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Wen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Wen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Wen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Wen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Wen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Wen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Wen. The network helps show where Ping Wen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Wen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Wen Line = papers co-authored together Ping Wen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Isolation and identification of cancer stem-like cells from murine melanoma cell lines.
2007116
2 202464
3 200929
4 202320
5
C-glycosylfavones and aromatic glycosides from Campylotropis hirtella (Franch.) Schindl.
200716
6 201515
7 201915
8 200815
9 200815
10 20236
11 20235
12 20252
13 20242
14 20251
15
Study of anti-melanoma effect in mice injected with melanoma cells transfected with the recombinant expressing Ag85A and GM-CSF
20101
16 20241
17 20161
18 20081

About Ping Wen

Ping Wen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Oncology, Rehabilitation and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (4 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (2 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (2 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers) and Plant chemical constituents analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (33 citations), Oncology (116 citations), Cancer Research (40 citations), Immunology (54 citations) and Biomaterials (33 citations). Ping Wen has collaborated with scholars based in China, Philippines and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Weihua Hu, Fengshu Zhao, Yating Li, Jun Dou, Ning Gu, Kai Hu, Lili Chu, Quan Tang, Meng Pan and Xin‐Sheng Yao. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Functional Materials, Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Foods and Cell Biology International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact