Ping Lu

50 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ping Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 163
  • Animal Science and Zoology 98
  • Molecular Biology 591
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 66
  • Immunology 103
Replace Le Wang with:
Le Wang China
Tao Jiang China
Yafang Wang China
Chu Wu China
He Finland
Jeong‐Ho Lee South Korea
Yilei Wang China
Zhen Liu China
Ping Lu relative to Le Wang China Le Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Le Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Lu. The network helps show where Ping Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Lu Line = papers co-authored together Ping Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017270
2 2008159
3 2013145
4 201291
5 201087
6 200781
7 201344
8 201938
9 201536
10 200833
11 200933
12 201828
13 201423
14 201920
15 201816
16 201915
17 201215
18 201815
19
Theory and experimental studies of enhanced gas drainage in the high-gas face of low permeability coal multi-seams
201013
20 201513

About Ping Lu

Ping Lu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pollution, Environmental Chemistry and Soil Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (6 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (5 papers), Geoscience and Mining Technology (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (4 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Geomechanics and Mining Engineering (3 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (163 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (98 citations), Molecular Biology (591 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (66 citations) and Immunology (103 citations). Ping Lu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles W.M. Roberts, Qiyan Feng, Peter J. Park, B. Alver, Qingjun Meng, Hongwen Huang, Jianqing Ding, Richard N. Mack, Haley E. Manchester and Kimberly H. Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Water Quality Research Journal, Journal of Water and Health, Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology and Environmental Earth Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact