Ping Liao

789 citations
30 papers · 466 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Liao

26 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Ping Liao
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Developmental Neuroscience 52
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 26
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 20
  • Neurology 28
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
Replace Xu Jin with:
Xu Jin China
Yuki Maeda Japan
Lize Xiong China
Takayuki Kikuchi Japan
Yingying Wang China
Zhengrong Lin China
Hui Zheng China
Xiaona Zhu China
Panmiao Liu China
J. Strutz Germany
Ping Liao relative to Xu Jin China Xu Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Xu Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Liao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Liao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Liao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Liao. The network helps show where Ping Liao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Liao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Liao Line = papers co-authored together Ping Liao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018139
2 202073
3 201958
4 202331
5 202025
6 202119
7 202316
8 201215
9 202012
10 202311
11 20238
12 20238
13 20228
14 20217
15 20057
16 20246
17 20246
18 20093
19 20212
20 20252

About Ping Liao

Ping Liao is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (3 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Optical Network Technologies (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers) and Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (52 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (26 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (20 citations), Neurology (28 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (7 citations). Ping Liao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Ruotian Jiang, Qin Zhang, Feng Chen, Rongni Du, Kai Wu, Qiang Fu, Yunxia Zuo, Bin Zhou, Lu Huang and Xinyu He. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Glia, Neural Plasticity and Twin Research and Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact