Ping Han

1.1k citations
38 papers · 815 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Han

37 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Ping Han
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Urology 122
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 137
  • Surgery 226
  • Transplantation 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 122
Replace Çetin Levent Peşkircioğlu with:
Çetin Levent Peşkircioğlu Türkiye
Kyung Jin Oh South Korea
Frédéric Staerman France
Ioannis Vakalopoulos Greece
Emin Aydur Türkiye
Walter José Koff Brazil
Ahmet Ürkmez Türkiye
C. Sparwasser Germany
Franco Antonio Mario Bergamaschi Italy
Abhishek Seth United States
Ping Han relative to Çetin Levent Peşkircioğlu Türkiye Çetin Levent Peşkircioğlu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Çetin Levent Peşkircioğlu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Han

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Han's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Han with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Han more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Han

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Han. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Han. The network helps show where Ping Han may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Han, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Han Line = papers co-authored together Ping Han links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201468
2 201359
3 201750
4 202247
5 201346
6 201141
7 201432
8 201431
9 202030
10 201529
11 202029
12 202027
13 201226
14 201725
15 202025
16 201323
17 201523
18 201823
19 202119
20 202017

About Ping Han

Ping Han is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology and Urology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (10 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (3 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper) and Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (122 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (137 citations), Surgery (226 citations), Transplantation (14 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (122 citations). Ping Han has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Qiang Wei, Yin Tang, Yunjin Bai, Jinhong Li, Dechao Feng, Yubo Yang, Liangren Liu, Chunxiao Pu, Shuo Zheng and Wuran Wei. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations, Scientific Reports, Journal of Endourology and International Journal of Impotence Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact