Ping Fu

855 citations
28 papers · 611 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Fu

26 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers

Ping Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Endocrinology 81
  • Biotechnology 133
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 125
  • Food Science 191
  • Communication 41
Replace Jack A. Neal with:
Jack A. Neal United States
Murray Smith Australia
Bora Kwon South Korea
Sandeep Walia United States
Dominique Meunier Canada
Isabelle Albert Luxembourg
Jeannie Sneed United States
Eva Hoff Sweden
Sigrún Gudmundsdóttir Norway
Christopher S. Walsh United States
Ping Fu relative to Jack A. Neal United States Jack A. Neal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Jack A. Neal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Fu. The network helps show where Ping Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Fu Line = papers co-authored together Ping Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017104
2 200790
3 201888
4 202174
5 200739
6 200338
7 202131
8 201727
9 202123
10 201715
11 202314
12 202414
13 201611
14 20237
15 20077
16 20246
17 20216
18 20255
19 20193
20 20242

About Ping Fu

Ping Fu is a scholar working on Food Science, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Endocrinology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Safety and Hygiene (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (81 citations), Biotechnology (133 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (125 citations), Food Science (191 citations) and Communication (41 citations). Ping Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yunchang Guo, Dora C. Lau, Weiwei Li, Jun Liu, Haihong Han, Li Bai, Xueyan Li, Jikai Liu, Min Li and Gary Yukl. Their work appears in journals such as Asia Pacific Journal of Management, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, China CDC Weekly, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease and Neurobiology of Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact