Ping Ding

611 citations
35 papers · 472 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Ding

35 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Ping Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 90
  • Pharmacology 80
  • Toxicology 13
  • Pharmacology 61
  • Plant Science 118
Replace Hyo Moon Cho with:
Hyo Moon Cho South Korea
Lanxiang Jiang China
B.M. Vrushabendra Swamy India
Ishaq Muhammad China
Eunju Shin South Korea
Reham M. El‐Meligy Saudi Arabia
Asma Aktar Bangladesh
A. Balakrishnan India
Zhongqiong Yin China
Agula Bo China
Ping Ding relative to Hyo Moon Cho South Korea Hyo Moon Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Hyo Moon Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Ding. The network helps show where Ping Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ping Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201952
2 202046
3 202145
4 202042
5 201740
6 202035
7 202133
8 201521
9 202118
10 201517
11 201914
12 202113
13 202213
14 202113
15 20218
16 20158
17 20158
18 20227
19 20206
20 20205

About Ping Ding

Ping Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Morinda citrifolia extract uses (9 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (3 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (90 citations), Pharmacology (80 citations), Toxicology (13 citations), Pharmacology (61 citations) and Plant Science (118 citations). Ping Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Italy and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Shaozhen Hou, Shuxian Chen, Depo Yang, Zhimin Zhao, Yonger Chen, Xiao‐Ping Lai, Tijiang Shan, Ziling Mao, Jie Gao and Jian Liang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, BMC Plant Biology, The American Journal of Chinese Medicine and Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact