Ping Chai

902 citations
25 papers · 792 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Chai

25 papers receiving 781 citations

Peers

Ping Chai
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 404
  • Condensed Matter Physics 189
  • Materials Chemistry 526
  • Ceramics and Composites 52
  • Inorganic Chemistry 91
Replace K. Taïbî with:
K. Taïbî Algeria
B. Cekić Serbia
Hossein Ahmadvand Iran
E. Sominski Israel
A. Drašner Croatia
Jungu Xu China
Junji Awaka Japan
Jesús Prado‐Gonjal Spain
Chul Hyun Yo South Korea
Javed Ahmad Pakistan
Ping Chai relative to K. Taïbî Algeria K. Taïbî's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
K. Taïbî · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Chai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Chai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Chai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Chai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Chai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Chai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Chai. The network helps show where Ping Chai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Chai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Chai Line = papers co-authored together Ping Chai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013192
2 2008133
3 2008130
4 2014103
5 200730
6 201426
7 201219
8 200919
9 201519
10 201615
11 200814
12 201113
13 200811
14 201711
15 200710
16 20119
17 20147
18 20157
19 20147
20 20155

About Ping Chai

Ping Chai is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (11 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (8 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (7 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (6 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), MXene and MAX Phase Materials (4 papers) and Electromagnetic wave absorption materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (404 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (189 citations), Materials Chemistry (526 citations), Ceramics and Composites (52 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (91 citations). Ping Chai has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Shatruk, Xiaoyan Tan, Jian Meng, Corey M. Thompson, Zhongli Wang, M. Lv, Yao Liu, Xiaojuan Liu, Xiaojuan Liu and John D. Corbett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Chemistry of Materials and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact