Pim Mostert
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Face Recognition and Perception
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
-
- Multisensory perception and integration
Papers in
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 7
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 5
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 3
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 3
- Face Recognition and Perception 3
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 2
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 1
- Co-authors
- Floris P. de Lange (8 shared papers)Peter Kok (4 shared papers)Matthias Fritsche (1 shared paper)Nadine Dijkstra (1 shared paper)Sander Bosch (1 shared paper)Loek Brinkman (1 shared paper)Anke Marit Albers (1 shared paper)Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- eLife (1 paper)eNeuro (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Pim Mostert
8 papers receiving 687 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Cognitive Neuroscience 627
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Sensory Systems 31
- General Decision Sciences 12
- Developmental Biology 6
Countries citing papers authored by Pim Mostert
This map shows the geographic impact of Pim Mostert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pim Mostert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pim Mostert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pim Mostert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pim Mostert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pim Mostert. The network helps show where Pim Mostert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Pim Mostert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 272 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 191 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 |
About Pim Mostert
Pim Mostert is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (627 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations), Sensory Systems (31 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations) and Developmental Biology (6 citations). Pim Mostert has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Floris P. de Lange, Peter Kok, Matthias Fritsche, Nadine Dijkstra, Sander Bosch, Loek Brinkman, Anke Marit Albers, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen, Heleen A. Slagter and Simon van Gaal. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, eNeuro, Current Biology, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.