Piers Fleming

34 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

Piers Fleming
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • General Decision Sciences 29
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 45
  • Rehabilitation 49
  • Public Administration 27
  • Safety Research 61
Replace Josefa González‐Santos with:
Josefa González‐Santos Spain
Hannah Pazderka Canada
Pedro Teixeira Portugal
James S. Cole United States
Lora Appel Canada
Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy United States
Matthew G. Cox United States
Elaine Chan United States
Kelly D. Cobey Canada
David Wilkins United Kingdom
Piers Fleming relative to Josefa González‐Santos Spain Josefa González‐Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Josefa González‐Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Piers Fleming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Piers Fleming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piers Fleming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piers Fleming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Piers Fleming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piers Fleming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piers Fleming. The network helps show where Piers Fleming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Piers Fleming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Piers Fleming Line = papers co-authored together Piers Fleming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962102
2 195996
3
Bleomycin therapy: a contraindication to the use of nitrous oxide-oxygen psychosedation in the dental office.
198836
4 201423
5 201223
6 200521
7 201819
8 201518
9 201517
10 201716
11 201414
12 200713
13 200512
14 202012
15 200911
16 201011
17 202110
18 201210
19 20168
20 20108

About Piers Fleming

Piers Fleming is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (3 papers), Risk Perception and Management (3 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (29 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (45 citations), Rehabilitation (49 citations), Public Administration (27 citations) and Safety Research (61 citations). Piers Fleming has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel John Zizzo, J. F. Morrison, N. B. Strydom, C. H. Wyndham, Steven James Watson, Jean Maritz, Shaaron Aınsworth, C. G. Williams, John V. St. Peter and G. A. G. Bredell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk Research, PLoS ONE, The British Journal of Social Work, Journal of Applied Physiology and Computers in Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact