Piero Procacci

137 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Piero Procacci
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 673
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.6k
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 203
  • Spectroscopy 511
  • Molecular Biology 2.0k
Replace Masahiro Kinoshita with:
Masahiro Kinoshita Japan
Emilio Gallicchio United States
Jed W. Pitera United States
Richard H. Henchman United Kingdom
J. Postma Netherlands
Fabio Sterpone France
H. J. C. Berendsen Netherlands
George A. Kaminski United States
Sander Pronk United States
Stefan Boresch Austria
Piero Procacci relative to Masahiro Kinoshita Japan Masahiro Kinoshita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Masahiro Kinoshita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Piero Procacci

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Piero Procacci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piero Procacci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piero Procacci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Piero Procacci

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piero Procacci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piero Procacci. The network helps show where Piero Procacci may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Piero Procacci, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Piero Procacci Line = papers co-authored together Piero Procacci links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 139 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002231
2 2019216
3 1997162
4 2020125
5 1999124
6 2002119
7 1999113
8 2019108
9 1999106
10 2006102
11 200696
12 199894
13 199684
14 200981
15 200279
16 200876
17 199673
18 200271
19 200768
20 199965

About Piero Procacci

Piero Procacci is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 139 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (49 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (48 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (31 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (18 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (16 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (16 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (9 papers) and Crystallography and molecular interactions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (673 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.6k citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (203 citations), Spectroscopy (511 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.0k citations). Piero Procacci has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Chelli, Vincenzo Schettino, Massimo Marchi, Marco Pagliai, Gianni Cardini, Francesco Luigi Gervasio, Simone Marsili, Salvatore Califano, Marina Macchiagodena and Alessandro Barducci. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Journal of Computational Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact