Phyllis Sloyer

825 citations
19 papers · 624 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Phyllis Sloyer

19 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Phyllis Sloyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 197
  • General Health Professions 211
  • Speech and Hearing 50
  • Health 49
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 31
Replace Robina Shah with:
Robina Shah United Kingdom
Terrah Foster Akard United States
Wendy Auslander United States
Katja Gravenhorst United Kingdom
Mary Ann Scoloveno United States
Celeste R. Phillips United States
Maria da Graça Corso da Motta Brazil
Jennifer Kirton United Kingdom
Madlyn C. Morreale United States
Thelma Begley Ireland
Phyllis Sloyer relative to Robina Shah United Kingdom Robina Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Robina Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phyllis Sloyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phyllis Sloyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phyllis Sloyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phyllis Sloyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phyllis Sloyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phyllis Sloyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phyllis Sloyer. The network helps show where Phyllis Sloyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phyllis Sloyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phyllis Sloyer Line = papers co-authored together Phyllis Sloyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2011169
2 200783
3 201060
4 201053
5 200850
6 200946
7 201127
8 200821
9 200917
10 201115
11 201215
12 201215
13 201012
14 20109
15
Pediatric nurses' attitudes toward hospice and pediatric palliative care.
20119
16 20098
17 20117
18 20117
19 20101

About Phyllis Sloyer

Phyllis Sloyer is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Speech and Hearing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (197 citations), General Health Professions (211 citations), Speech and Hearing (50 citations), Health (49 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (31 citations). Phyllis Sloyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Caprice Knapp, Vanessa Madden, Elizabeth Shenkman, Hua Wang, Charlotte Curtis, I‐Chan Huang, Mircea Marcu, James M. Perrin, Diane Romm and Nora Wells. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Journal, International Journal of Palliative Nursing, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact