Phyllis Shaw

1.3k citations
15 papers · 1k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Phyllis Shaw

15 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

Phyllis Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 730
  • Clinical Psychology 209
  • General Psychology 9
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 58
Replace Thomas G. Stampfl with:
Thomas G. Stampfl United States
I. M. Marks United Kingdom
Susan J. Grey United Kingdom
Bernard L. Frankel United States
Edwin Kahn United States
Theodore J. Nettelbeck Australia
James D. Papsdorf United States
Ann E. Lumry United States
Katherine Z. W. Whipple United States
Jennifer C. Cousins United States
Phyllis Shaw relative to Thomas G. Stampfl United States Thomas G. Stampfl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Thomas G. Stampfl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phyllis Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phyllis Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phyllis Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phyllis Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phyllis Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phyllis Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phyllis Shaw. The network helps show where Phyllis Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Phyllis Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phyllis Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Phyllis Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1983269
2 1973134
3 1976124
4 1977110
5 197888
6 197674
7 197352
8 197440
9 197940
10 197630
11 197924
12 197717
13
Specific and nonspecific factors in behavior therapy
19738
14 19755
15 19762

About Phyllis Shaw

Phyllis Shaw is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (12 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (730 citations), Clinical Psychology (209 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (58 citations). Phyllis Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Gelder, Derek William Johnston, Andrew Mathews, A Mathews, Dennis H. Gath, John Teasdale, KRYSIA M. YARDLEY, Bridget Bryant, Peter Trower and John Bancroft. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Behavior Modification, Medical Education and Behavior Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact