Phyllis E. Hoar

1.1k citations
21 papers · 901 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Phyllis E. Hoar

21 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

Phyllis E. Hoar
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 474
  • Cell Biology 183
  • Molecular Biology 651
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 136
  • Physiology 120
Replace M. O. Aksoy with:
M. O. Aksoy United States
Steven P. Driska United States
Elmi Leisner Germany
Rolf Thieleczek Germany
K. Horiuti Japan
D S Wood United States
J. C. Rüegg Germany
Tsuyoshi Totsuka Japan
C J Kean United States
H Gonzalez‐Serratos United States
Phyllis E. Hoar relative to M. O. Aksoy United States M. O. Aksoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. O. Aksoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phyllis E. Hoar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phyllis E. Hoar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phyllis E. Hoar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phyllis E. Hoar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phyllis E. Hoar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phyllis E. Hoar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phyllis E. Hoar. The network helps show where Phyllis E. Hoar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Phyllis E. Hoar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phyllis E. Hoar Line = papers co-authored together Phyllis E. Hoar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979162
2 1979134
3 1981100
4
Calcium-activated tension: the role of myosin light chain phosphorylation.
198051
5 198045
6 198744
7 198040
8 199039
9 198139
10 198135
11 198535
12 199130
13 198530
14 199120
15 197920
16 198819
17 199218
18 198818
19 197911
20 199410

About Phyllis E. Hoar

Phyllis E. Hoar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (15 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (11 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (4 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (474 citations), Cell Biology (183 citations), Molecular Biology (651 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (136 citations) and Physiology (120 citations). Phyllis E. Hoar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include W. Glenn L. Kerrick, Paul Cassidy, Dean A. Malencik, John D. Potter, James D. Potter, M D Pato, Charles Mahoney, Edmond H. Fischer, Henry G. Zot and Michael P. Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, The Journal of Physiology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact