Phuc Pham-Duc

30 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

Phuc Pham-Duc
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 60
  • Molecular Medicine 50
  • Parasitology 66
  • Food Science 158
  • Pollution 98
Replace Francis Ejobi with:
Francis Ejobi Uganda
Olanike Kudirat Adeyemo Nigeria
M. Papapetropoulou Greece
V.J. Umoh Nigeria
Jenna M. Swarthout United States
Ben A. Smith Canada
Tom Chiller United States
Katharine M. Benedict United States
Erik Alm Sweden
Phuc Pham-Duc relative to Francis Ejobi Uganda Francis Ejobi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Francis Ejobi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phuc Pham-Duc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phuc Pham-Duc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phuc Pham-Duc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phuc Pham-Duc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phuc Pham-Duc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phuc Pham-Duc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phuc Pham-Duc. The network helps show where Phuc Pham-Duc may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phuc Pham-Duc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phuc Pham-Duc Line = papers co-authored together Phuc Pham-Duc links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201999
2 201364
3 202138
4 201435
5 201134
6 201633
7 201833
8 201733
9 201631
10 201828
11 201627
12 201827
13 201625
14 202124
15 202123
16 201620
17 202118
18 201617
19 201714
20 201410

About Phuc Pham-Duc

Phuc Pham-Duc is a scholar working on Food Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 32 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Safety and Hygiene (8 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (8 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (6 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (5 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (3 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (60 citations), Molecular Medicine (50 citations), Parasitology (66 citations), Food Science (158 citations) and Pollution (98 citations). Phuc Pham-Duc has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, Switzerland and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Hung Nguyen‐Viet, Sinh Dang-Xuan, Delia Grace, Fred Unger, Christian Zurbrügg, Jakob Zinsstag, Hien Thi Nguyen, Jan Hattendorf, Peter Odermatt and Pawin Padungtod. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Health, International Journal of Food Microbiology, PLoS ONE, Infectious Diseases of Poverty and One Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact