Phoebe Imms

760 citations
16 papers · 175 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Phoebe Imms

13 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

Phoebe Imms
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 97
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 72
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Neurology 37
  • Epidemiology 76
Replace Maxwell Wang with:
Maxwell Wang United States
J.-F. Méder France
Hannah M. Lindsey United States
Joselisa Péres Queiroz de Paiva Brazil
Cooper B. Hodges United States
Tatiana Usnich Germany
Annalisa Baglieri Italy
Bethany L. Sussman United States
Samuel Guay Canada
Yuttachai Likitjaroen Thailand
Phoebe Imms relative to Maxwell Wang United States Maxwell Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maxwell Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe Imms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe Imms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe Imms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe Imms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe Imms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe Imms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe Imms. The network helps show where Phoebe Imms may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phoebe Imms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phoebe Imms Line = papers co-authored together Phoebe Imms links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201951
2 201834
3 202124
4 202214
5 202210
6 20229
7 20218
8 20236
9 20226
10 20235
11 20243
12 20223
13 20232
14 20240
15 20260
16 20230

About Phoebe Imms

Phoebe Imms is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 16 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (97 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (72 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Neurology (37 citations) and Epidemiology (76 citations). Phoebe Imms has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter H. Wilson, Karen Caeyenberghs, Adam Clemente, Derek K. Jones, Andrei Irimia, Mark Cook, Wendyl D’Souza, Juan F. Domínguez D, Govinda Poudel and Gary F. Egan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series A, GeroScience, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact